Institutional Repository
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   University of Economics & Technology Repository
  • Akademik Arşiv / Institutional Repository
  • Mühendislik Fakültesi / Faculty of Engineering
  • Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü / Department of Mechanical Engineering
  • View Item
  •   University of Economics & Technology Repository
  • Akademik Arşiv / Institutional Repository
  • Mühendislik Fakültesi / Faculty of Engineering
  • Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü / Department of Mechanical Engineering
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Biomechanical comparison of unilateral semi-rigid and dynamic stabilization on ovine vertebrae

Thumbnail
Date
2015-11
Author
Karakoyun, Dursun O.
Ozkaya, Mustafa
Okutan, Volkan C.
Dalgic, Ali
Belen, Deniz
Demir, Teyfik
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Using the unilateral pedicle screw fixation was thought to decrease the stiffness of the fixed segments. Various prospective, randomized studies were performed to determine whether unilateral pedicle screw fixation provides the necessities of bilateral fixation in one- or two-segment lumbar spinal fusion. In this study, four different unilateral pedicle screw fixation systems were evaluated to determine which one best approximated an intact spine with respect to biomechanics and kinematics. The four groups included an intact group, a unilateral facetectomy group with no fixation, a unilateral semi-rigid pedicle screw fixation group with a poly-ether-ether-ketone rod, and a unilateral dynamic pedicle screw fixation group. The bone mineral densities of all specimens were measured and specimens were matched with groups randomly. Flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation tests were performed to compare the groups. For the flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation tests, the best biomechanical outcomes were in the control group. The unilateral facetectomy group had the poorest performance and was not stable enough, compared with the control group. The dynamic and semi-rigid groups showed performance closer to that of the control group. The biomechanical responses of these two groups were also in good agreement, showing no significant statistical differences. Based on these test results, it is concluded that the unilateral dynamic and semi-rigid pedicle screw fixations can be used to provide stability to the vertebrae.
URI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411915612493
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/1528
Collections
  • Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü / Department of Mechanical Engineering

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 




by OpenAIRE

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit DateBy TypeKapsamWOSScopusPubMedTR-DizinAvrupa Birliği Destekli Yayın SayısıTÜBİTAK Destekli Yayın SayısıDilErişimThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit DateBy TypeKapsamWOSScopusPubMedTR-DizinAvrupa Birliği Destekli Yayın SayısıTÜBİTAK Destekli Yayın SayısıDilErişim

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 


Creative Commons License
Institutional Repository by TOBB ETU Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License..

Institutional Repository:



TOBB ETU için Devinim Yazılım Eğitim Danışmanlık tarafından özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.