Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEkmekci, Perihan Elif
dc.contributor.authorGüner, Müberra Devrim
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-30T07:28:20Z
dc.date.available2019-12-30T07:28:20Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationEkmekci, P., & Güner, M. (2019). Evaluation of Ethical Analyses in Seven Reports from the European Network for Health Technology Assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 35(4), 273-279. doi:10.1017/S0266462319000485en_US
dc.identifier.issn0266-4623
dc.identifier.other7
dc.description"This article has been published in a revised form in International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462319000485. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care"
dc.description.abstractObjectives Ethics has been considered among the core domains of health technology assessment (HTA), but there are still disputes regarding ethical analysis. This study aimed to examine full final reports of the European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) in terms of their compliance with the ethical methodology and ethical perspective of the HTA Core Model (R). Methods The study examines seven full final HTA reports of EUnetHTA written based on the methodology proposed in the HTA Core Model (R). The reports were analyzed using the following parameters: competency of the person/group who conducted ethical analysis, assessment elements, and the methodology of ethical analysis. Results The results show that, although the HTA Core Model (R) helped to standardize the final reports of the assessment, there are still concerns regarding the competency of the ethical analysis team, the perspectives on the purpose of ethical analysis, data sources and viewpoints of various stakeholders, use of ethical analysis methodology, and the evaluation of the ethical appropriateness of the entire HTA process. Conclusions The HTA Core Model (R) helped to standardize the final reports on the HTA; however, not all issues with the content and outcomes were solved. The lack of expertise in ethics and insufficiency of the teams regarding ethical analysis are other existing problems. This study also demonstrated that stakeholder viewpoints in general and patient perspectives, in particular, have been overlooked in the HTA process.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462319000485
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectHealth technology assessmenten_US
dc.subjectEthical analysisen_US
dc.subjectMethodologyen_US
dc.subjectEthical expertiseen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Ethical Analyses in Seven Reports from the European Network for Health Technology Assessmenten_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Careen_US
dc.contributor.departmentTOBB ETÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümütr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentTOBB ETU, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Basic Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.volume35
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage273
dc.identifier.endpage279
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0777-3861
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6982-9026
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000483778400005
dc.contributor.tobbetuauthorEkmekci, Perihan Elif
dc.contributor.tobbetuauthorGüner, Müberra Devrim
dc.contributor.wosresearcherIDO-7742-2016
dc.contributor.wosresearcherIDQ-1305-2015
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıtr_TR


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record