Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTanoğlu, Oğuzhan
dc.contributor.authorAlemdaroğlu, Kadir Bahadır
dc.contributor.authorİltar, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorÖzmeriç, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Teyfik
dc.contributor.authorErbay, Fatma Kübra
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-29T14:29:20Z
dc.date.available2019-03-29T14:29:20Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-08
dc.identifier.citationTanoğlu, O., Alemdaroğlu, K. B., İltar, S., Özmeriç, A., Demir, T., & Erbay, F. K. (2018). Biomechanical comparison of three different fixation techniques for anterior column posterior hemitransverse acetabular fractures using anterior intrapelvic approach. Injury, 49(8), 1513-1519.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0020-1383
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/899
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to biomechanically compare three different fixation methods for the fixation of anterior column posterior hemitransverse type acetabular fracture (ACPHT). Methods: ACPHT fracture models were created on twenty-four foam cortical shell artificial hemipelvis models. Three fixation methods were assessed - Group 1: posterior column lag screws over a suprapectineal plate; Group 2: Posterior column lag screws over a suprapectineal plate and an infrapectineal plate; Group 3: A suprapectineal plate and a vertical infrapectineal plate. Stiffness and displacement amounts of fixation methods under dynamic and static axial loading conditions were measured. Results: In the dynamic and static tests, Group 3 showed the less stable fixation compared to Group 2. There was no statistically significant difference between the stiffness values of the fixation groups. In the static tests, there was no statistically significant difference between Group 1 and 2, although less displacements were obtained in Group 2. Conclusions: A combination of posterior lag screws over a suprapectineal plate and an infrapectineal plate supporting the pelvic brim along both sides of the linea terminalis resulted in a better fixation construct than a suprapectineal plate accompanying with a vertical infrapectineal plate provide better stability with less fracture displacement.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTurkish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology; Turkish Orthopaedics Research Councilen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.020
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDynamic loadingen_US
dc.subjectStatic loadingen_US
dc.subjectBiomechanicalen_US
dc.subjectStiffnessen_US
dc.subjectInfrapectineal plateen_US
dc.subjectSuprapectineal plateen_US
dc.subjectStoppaen_US
dc.titleBiomechanical comparison of three different fixation techniques for anterior column posterior hemitransverse acetabular fractures using anterior intrapelvic approachen_US
dc.typearticle
dc.relation.journalInjuryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentTOBB ETÜ, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümütr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentTOBB ETU, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.volume49
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.startpage1513
dc.identifier.endpage1519
dc.contributor.orcidDemir, Teyfik [0000-0001-6352-8302]
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000441896100025
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85048725535
dc.contributor.tobbetuauthorDemir, Teyfik
dc.contributor.YOKidDemir, Teyfik [144123]
dc.identifier.PubMedIDPMID:29934096
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.020
dc.contributor.ScopusAuthorIDDemir, Teyfik [3488228600]
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıtr_TR


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record